{"schema":"sb.truth.v1","subject":"funding-round-spacex","title":"The Funding round: SpaceX record","tier":"standard","tierNote":"Standard-tier record, generated from the maintained event registry: reporting, our coverage metric, market expectation, and state history. No primary-source layer yet — first-party issuer verification is what upgrades a record to full tier, the discipline the hormuz record demonstrates.","subjectBinding":{"entity":"spacex","bound":true,"basis":"named-in-subject","statement":"Lead subject \"spacex\" — named in this record's own subject line (\"Funding round: SpaceX\"). The reporting, record, market and state-history layers below are that subject's own; none is borrowed from a neighbouring entity.","candidatesConsidered":["spacex"],"alsoDefensible":[],"rejected":[],"actionClass":"funding-round"},"publishState":"published","publishStateNote":null,"asOf":"2026-09-04","generatedAt":"2026-09-04T23:47:27.001318+00:00","tracked":true,"access":"Free — no key, no charge. Serves at GET /api/truth/funding-round-spacex and answers the get_truth_object MCP tool. (No exhibit page for standard-tier records yet — the API and MCP responses ARE the record.)","attribution":"Cite 'Signal Bureau' with https://sigb.ai/api/truth/funding-round-spacex so readers can verify.","layers":{"primarySources":{"label":"Observed operational state","status":"absent","basis":"not present on a standard-tier record — no first-party issuer has been routed for this subject yet; nothing here is previewed to look finished","sources":[]},"reporting":{"label":"Observed reporting","basis":"attributed sources — outside coverage in our tracked set; verify at the source. Prediction-market question pages are excluded: a venue question is not journalism, whoever hosts it. Filtered for EVENT relevance, not just subject: a row is served only if it names \"spacex\" AND carries a term from this record's own subject line, or two terms from its market-question set. The subject's name alone is the key its corpus was sampled on, so it proves nothing about this event — each served row names the terms it matched in eventTerms.","status":"none-event-relevant","note":"Measured zero after event-relevance filtering: we sampled 6 attributable rows for \"spacex\" and not one could be shown to be about \"Funding round: SpaceX\" — each carried the subject's name and nothing else this record is about. They are withheld rather than served: a subject's general coverage is not this event's reporting, and serving it under this record's label would be worse than serving nothing. That is a count, not a gap.","sampledForSubject":6,"served":0,"withheldNotEventRelevant":6,"relevanceTerms":{"subjectLine":["funding","round"],"questionSet":["valuation","hit","high","low","35t","second","highest","private"]},"items":[]},"record":{"label":"The record itself","basis":"our own count of documents we ingested and can name — not a claim about the world, and market questions are excluded because a question is not reporting","documents":650,"outlets":149,"activeDays":134,"firstSeen":"2026-03-03","firstSeenStatus":"observed","firstSeenNote":null,"lastSeen":"2026-09-04","lastSeenStatus":"observed","lastSeenNote":null,"homeDomains":["aerospace_defense"],"asserts":{"launch-release":210,"ipo-listing":27,"utterance":20,"acquisition":13,"military-action":9,"funding-round":7},"assertionCoverage":0.457,"movesWith":[{"name":"falcon","together":190,"sharedDomains":["aerospace_defense"]},{"name":"earth","together":172,"sharedDomains":["aerospace_defense"]},{"name":"nasa","together":170,"sharedDomains":["aerospace_defense"]},{"name":"space force","together":132,"sharedDomains":["aerospace_defense"]},{"name":"starlink","together":108,"sharedDomains":["aerospace_defense"]},{"name":"florida","together":93,"sharedDomains":["aerospace_defense"]},{"name":"spacex falcon","together":82,"sharedDomains":["aerospace_defense"]},{"name":"cape canaveral","together":66,"sharedDomains":["aerospace_defense"]}],"movesWithLabels":["falcon","earth","nasa","space force","starlink","florida","spacex falcon","cape canaveral"],"provenance":"curated"},"coverageMetric":{"label":"Coverage state","basis":"our own measurement — our attention, not the event's state","direction":"insufficient_history","baselineRelativePct":null,"reading":"History still too thin for a baseline; day-over-day read.","trackedDays":null,"eventMentions":1205,"periods":[{"period":"2026","mentions":1205}]},"market":{"label":"Market expectation","basis":"attributed — markets price collective belief about defined outcomes; belief, not fact, and never proof that an event occurred","rowsStatus":"none-captured","rowsNote":"Measured zero: no priced capture rides \"spacex\" in this build.","current":[],"arc":[],"eventArc":{"name":"Funding round: SpaceX","slug":"funding-round-spacex","questionCount":11,"questions":["Will SpaceX's valuation hit (HIGH) $1.6T by June 30?","Will SpaceX's valuation hit (LOW) $1.35T by June 30?","Will SpaceX have the second highest private market valuation on June 30?"],"mentions":1205,"firstSeen":"2026-05-24","firstSeenStatus":"observed","lastSeen":"2026-08-03","lastSeenStatus":"observed","stampNote":null}},"judgment":{"label":"Our reading","basis":"derived judgment — our reading over the layers above; ours, and labeled ours","asOf":"2026-09-04","text":"A standard-tier record keeps its layers apart and does not collapse them. Lead subject \"spacex\" — named in this record's own subject line (\"Funding round: SpaceX\"). The reporting, record, market and state-history layers below are that subject's own; none is borrowed from a neighbouring entity. Our coverage metric measures our attention; the reporting is attributed, not verified against first-party issuers; the market layer prices belief, not fact. Reading any single layer as \"the answer\" is how a machine gets this wrong — and this record's honest limit is stated in its tier: no primary-source layer exists here yet."},"consensus":{"label":"Reporting consensus","basis":"retroactive claims ledger — kernel facts scored by independent-chain agreement","pending":true,"note":"No claims ledger has been computed for this subject yet — consensus scoring is full-tier machinery.","retired":[]},"stateHistory":{"label":"State history","basis":"recorded transitions — never edited after the fact","status":"recorded","note":null,"transitions":[{"field":"coverage state","from":"rising","to":"steady","at":"2026-09-01T15:11:18.454578+00:00","heldSince":"2026-08-25T15:15:51.750926+00:00"},{"field":"coverage state","from":"steady","to":"insufficient_history","at":"2026-09-02T15:12:31.676793+00:00","heldSince":"2026-09-01T15:11:18.454578+00:00"},{"field":"wire tier","from":"flagged","to":"watch","at":"2026-09-02T15:12:31.676793+00:00","heldSince":"2026-09-01T15:11:18.454578+00:00"}]}}}